The Upcoming
  • Culture
    • Art
    • Cinema & Tv
      • Movie reviews
      • Film festivals
      • Shows
    • Food & Drinks
      • News & Features
      • Restaurant & bar reviews
      • Interviews & Recipes
    • Literature
    • Music
      • Live music
    • Theatre
  • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Accessories
    • Beauty
    • News & Features
    • Shopping & Trends
    • Tips & How-tos
    • Fashion weeks
  • What’s On
    • Art exhibitions
    • Theatre shows
  • Tickets
  • Join us
    • Editorial unit
    • Our writers
    • Join the team
    • Join the mailing list
    • Support us
    • Contact us
  • Interviews
  • Competitions
  • Special events
    • Film festivals
      • Berlin
      • Tribeca
      • Sundance London
      • Cannes
      • Locarno
      • Venice
      • London
      • Toronto
    • Fashion weeks
      • London Fashion Week
      • New York Fashion Week
      • Milan Fashion Week
      • Paris Fashion Week
      • Haute Couture
      • London Fashion Week Men’s
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Instagram

  • YouTube

  • RSS

Current affairs

Nick Clegg admits government is reconsidering child benefit cuts

Nick Clegg admits government is reconsidering child benefit cuts
5 March 2012
Annalisa Ratti
Avatar
Annalisa Ratti
5 March 2012

This morning Nick Clegg told BBC Breakfast the government is looking again at child benefit cuts because of the “unintended consequences” of the current plans.

Mr. Clegg confirmed the government is considering changes to its plan for axing child benefits from higher taxpayers.

Under the current plan, all families in which one parent earns more than the £42,475-a-year threshold for 40 per cent tax will lose all their child benefit.

A couple with two children would lose more than £1,750 a year. But a family with a combined income of more than £80,000 could keep their child benefit in full, provided neither parent pays higher rate tax.

The Deputy Prime Minister said it was right to ensure that those on the highest salaries bear their share of the burden of deficit reduction.

He told Sky News: “There’s an issue about how you do that, so you make sure you don’t create these unintended consequences where, say, a family with one upper-income earner get child benefit removed when there’s another family with two income earners who collectively earn more but keep the benefits.”

The Treasury is studying a range of detailed options for softening the impact of the change due to come into force next year: raising the income threshold to £50,000, giving higher-rate taxpayers only half the child benefit or restricting payments to families with children under five.

But in a statement last night the Treasury made no reference to higher-rate taxpayers, focusing instead on those earning more than £80,000.

Clegg declined to discuss any specifics of the alterations being considered, saying that his priority was seeing a rise in the threshold at which people start paying tax.

Critics last night warned the detailed options being considered did not go far enough. Tory MP Mark Reckless said: “None of these proposals addresses the unfairness of single-earner couples with a stay-at-home parent losing their child benefit while two-earner households with much larger incomes keep theirs.”

Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls yesterday defined the child benefit changes as “perverse anomalies” which would affect hundreds of thousands of families.

He pointed out that a family with three children with a top-rate tax payer would lose £2,500 – the equivalent of a £3,500 salary cut because child benefit is tax-free.

According to the Treasury, these child benefit changes would save £2.4bn in 2013-14 and £2.5bn in 2014-15.

Annalisa Ratti

Related Items

More in Current Affairs

Changes to expect during menopause

The editorial unit
Read More

Nek brings Italian pop rock to the Shepherd’s Bush Empire

The editorial unit
Read More

Why Equity Linked Savings Schemes is a preferred tax saving?

The editorial unit
Read More

How the world’s top designers would rebrand political parties

The editorial unit
Read More

Royal baby furore: Proof that the British monarchy is still popular?

Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris
Read More

World Mental Health Day 2018: Raising awareness and combating stigma

The editorial unit
Read More

Seven political personalities you should know about

The editorial unit
Read More

Donald Trump: An enemy of the arts?

The editorial unit
Read More

Trump’s fortune: Where did the money come from?

The editorial unit
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap
  • Popular

  • Latest

  • TOP PICKS

  • Creation Stories
    ★★★★★
    Film festivals
  • Detroit Stories – Alice Cooper
    ★★★★★
    Album review
  • Judas and the Black Messiah
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Gatsby at Cadogan Hall: An interview with Jodie Steele and Ross William Wild
    Theatre
  • Laura Mvula – Under a Pink Moon
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • Back to the Wharf
    ★★★★★
    Film festivals
  • I’m Your Man (Ich bin dein Mensch)
    ★★★★★
    Berlinale
  • We (Nous)
    ★★★★★
    Berlinale
  • Language Lessons
    ★★★★★
    Berlinale
  • Moon, 66 Questions
    ★★★★★
    Berlinale
  • We (Nous)
    ★★★★★
    Berlinale
  • Bicep at Saatchi Gallery Online
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • The Winter Lake
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Spotlight: Lauren Everet and Soup Kitchen London, striving for food security and social equality
    Food & Drinks
  • Da Capo
    ★★★★★
    Film festivals
The Upcoming
Pages
  • Contact us
  • Join mailing list
  • Join us
  • Our London food map
  • Our writers
  • Support us
  • What, when, why

Copyright © 2011-2020 FL Media

Vladimir Putin back in power
Iran’s nuclear programme: Israel demands international attention