The Upcoming
  • Cinema & Tv
    • Movie reviews
    • Film festivals
      • Berlin
      • Tribeca
      • Sundance London
      • Cannes
      • Locarno
      • Venice
      • London
      • Toronto
    • Show reviews
  • Music
    • Live music
  • Food & Drinks
    • News & Features
    • Restaurant & bar reviews
    • Interviews & Recipes
  • Theatre
  • Art
  • Travel & Lifestyle
  • Literature
  • Fashion & Beauty
    • Accessories
    • Beauty
    • News & Features
    • Shopping & Trends
    • Tips & How-tos
    • Fashion weeks
      • London Fashion Week
      • London Fashion Week Men’s
      • New York Fashion Week
      • Milan Fashion Week
      • Paris Fashion Week
      • Haute Couture
  • Join us
    • Editorial unit
    • Our writers
    • Join the team
    • Join the mailing list
    • Support us
    • Contact us
  • Competitions
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Instagram

  • YouTube

  • RSS

Current affairs

Meritocracy: The dirty word of a modern society?

Meritocracy: The dirty word of a modern society?
23 February 2013
Annalisa Ratti
Avatar
Annalisa Ratti
23 February 2013

In contemporary usage, the word “meritocracy” is predominantly deployed with a positive meaning. Likewise, a growth in meritocracy is seen as progress. While in the past the aristocracy inherited their seats on cabinets and on company boards, in more recent times people succeed thanks to intelligence, education and hard work.

Michael Young, the British sociologist and Labour activist who invented the word, intended it with a pejorative meaning. In his book, The Rise of the Meritocracy, published in 1958, he describes a futuristic Britain where a class-based elite has been replaced with a hierarchy of talent.

Confusion between merit and meritocracy leads perhaps to the contemporary use and abuse of the latter. Merit is a commendable quality, determined by a set of skills and good results both at school or work, while meritocracy literally means “society of merit”.

In line with this, Young’s fictional narrator defines the greater contributor to society as “creative minority” or “restless elite”, as opposed to “the stolid mass”. 

There are 1% of individuals who have consistently increased their incomes as a consequence of the premium that globalised high-tech economy places on the extremely clever. In Young’s hypothetical world, less talented and demoralised masses were ready to revolt.

There is, of course, nothing wrong with money flowing to talent rather than connections. However, the intelligent rich are transforming themselves into an entrenched elite. This meritocracy loop, defined also as a paradox of virtuous meritocracy, has been proven to deeply affect equality of opportunity.

In the US, where the elite has been particularly keen on passing the privilege down to the next generation, the lack of opportunities created by the meritocracy loop seems particularly evident.

Dubbing Miles Corak’s study “The Great Gatsby curve”, American economist Alan Krueger refers to the relationship between income inequality and social mobility across the generations. The “one-generation parameter” – how much a father’s income influences that of his adult son – shows that in the US and Britain around 50% of income differences in one generation are deeply connected to the income of the previous generation. In Scandinavia, figures show an income-social mobility relation of 30%.

America’s growing number of lower-class single mothers short of time and money, is an example of how close America is  to the realisation of the virtuous-meritocracy paradox. Conservatives blame the fall in the rate of marriage while the left focuses on the effects of redistribution. 

One study shows that the gap in test scores between the children of the wealthiest 10% of the population and its poorest counterpart rose by 30-40% in 25 years. These figures are coupled with the fact that the US government spends less money on the education of poor children than wealthy ones, especially for early-childhood education.

This happens because the school system is organised and funded at local level through property taxes, thus affluent areas have more money to spend.

American Universities’ prohibitive fees worsen the general situation. Very few children from poor backgrounds get into higher education and too many drop out.

Avoiding a future society where life possibilities are definitively pre-determined at birth would prevent the “restless elite” from unfairly adding to their privileges.

Standardised tests were first introduced in the US to favour the brightest students, but the $4.5 billion test-prep industry grew exclusively thanks to the rich. The same could be said for the astonishing growth of British private tuition for 11-plus exams.

The American university system itself reflects the paradox of virtuous meritocracy, giving preference to well-connected children whose parents have either made a donation to the University or are ex-Alumni.

In a world of equal opportunities, an educational establishment should attract the best students and then figure out how to finance the poorest among them.

None of these possible corrections to the system will be able to prevent the brainy and wealthy from investing in their offspring. It is something that comes naturally to parents and explains in full the slower social mobility of the middle and lower classes, despite the progress made in education in the last 50 years.

The best we could hope is that some of these measures may help to re-balance the insurmountable advantages of the elite and prevent the realisation of a two-tier society.

Annalisa Ratti

Related Items

More in Current Affairs

Women of Ireland have rolled over for long enough: The 8th and the long walk to abortion rights

Emma Kiely
Read More

Changes to expect during menopause

The editorial unit
Read More

Why Equity Linked Savings Schemes is a preferred tax saving?

The editorial unit
Read More

How the world’s top designers would rebrand political parties

The editorial unit
Read More

Royal baby furore: Proof that the British monarchy is still popular?

Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris
Read More

World Mental Health Day 2018: Raising awareness and combating stigma

The editorial unit
Read More

Seven political personalities you should know about

The editorial unit
Read More

Donald Trump: An enemy of the arts?

The editorial unit
Read More

Trump’s fortune: Where did the money come from?

The editorial unit
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap
  • Popular

  • Latest

  • TOP PICKS

  • Beauty and the Beast: The Musical at London Palladium
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Paolo Nutini – Last Night in the Bittersweet
    ★★★★★
    Album review
  • St Vincent at the Hammersmith Apollo
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • The Railway Children Return
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Netflix Walking Tour: From Bridgerton to The Crown, a free walking tour through the filming locations
    Cinema & Tv
  • The Throne at Charing Cross Theatre
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • “We really wanted to create a cabbage gun”: An interview with David Earl and Chris Hayward stars of Brian and Charles
    Cinema & Tv
  • Paolo Nutini – Last Night in the Bittersweet
    ★★★★★
    Album review
  • Viagra Boys – Cave World
    ★★★★★
    Album review
  • Ithaka
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Paolo Nutini – Last Night in the Bittersweet
    ★★★★★
    Album review
  • Viagra Boys – Cave World
    ★★★★★
    Album review
  • The Railway Children Return
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Adele lights up Hyde Park for BST Festival
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • Beauty and the Beast: The Musical at London Palladium
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
The Upcoming
Pages
  • Contact us
  • Join mailing list
  • Join us
  • Our London food map
  • Our writers
  • Support us
  • What, when, why
With the support from:
International driving license

Copyright © 2011-2020 FL Media

Osborne’s austerity plans fail as Britain is stripped of AAA rating
EU to linger in recession for another year‏