The Upcoming
  • Cinema & Tv
    • Movie reviews
    • Film festivals
      • Berlin
      • Tribeca
      • Sundance London
      • Cannes
      • Locarno
      • Venice
      • London
      • Toronto
    • Show reviews
  • Music
    • Live music
  • Food & Drinks
    • News & Features
    • Restaurant & bar reviews
    • Interviews & Recipes
  • Theatre
  • Art
  • Travel & Lifestyle
  • Literature
  • Fashion & Beauty
    • Accessories
    • Beauty
    • News & Features
    • Shopping & Trends
    • Tips & How-tos
    • Fashion weeks
      • London Fashion Week
      • London Fashion Week Men’s
      • New York Fashion Week
      • Milan Fashion Week
      • Paris Fashion Week
      • Haute Couture
  • Join us
    • Editorial unit
    • Our writers
    • Join the team
    • Join the mailing list
    • Support us
    • Contact us
  • Competitions
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Instagram

  • YouTube

  • RSS

Current affairsFinanceNewsPolitics & Social issues

Should political parties get rid of their dodgy donors?

Should political parties get rid of their dodgy donors?
16 February 2015
Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris
Avatar
Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris
16 February 2015

If this week’s revelation that HSBC covertly helped wealthy clients in Switzerland evade tax on their assets wasn’t scandalous enough, the news that numerous Swiss account-holders also happen to have made sizeable donations to UK political parties was bound to spark debate.

Sure enough, during prime minister’s questions on Wednesday, an especially inflamed exchange between Labour leader Ed Miliband and Conservative prime minister David Cameron was heard on that very matter.

In an otherwise undignified clash, the two leaders both made speculative remarks about the credibility of donors to each other’s party. However, the fact remains that no hard evidence has yet emerged to support either party’s speculations that HSBC abetted donors in evading tax.

Nevertheless, the debate has allowed room for one particularly important, if not entirely new, question: could democracy in the UK benefit from alternative methods for political party funding? How can the problem of “dodgy donors” be eliminated from the equation?

In recent years, certain scandals have given rise to questions over the security of a political system in which wealthy individuals or trade unions offering sizeable donations could potentially influence party policy.

In 2012, former Tory treasurer Peter Cruddas was filmed offering undercover journalists from the Sunday Times, who were posing as potential donors, private access to David Cameron and the chancellor George Osborne.

The paper was later ordered to pay £180,000 in libel damages to Mr Cruddas, however the “dinners for donors” scandal did little to ensure the confidence of the British public.

A 2014 public survey by the Electoral Reform Society revealed that three in four believe big donors hold too much influence over political parties. Furthermore, 61 per cent of people surveyed believed that the current party funding system is corrupt and ought to be overhauled. But what are the alternatives?

One recent suggestion, made by former Tory chancellor Ken Clarke, involves state funding and a cap to party donations by individuals.

Speaking to the Observer, Clarke said: “It puts everything above allegations of conflict of interest if the parties are not beholden to individual people, individual interests, for large sums of money.”

In a report published in November 2011, the Committee on Standards in Public Life proposed similar changes, namely a £10,000 donation cap for individual donors, increased public support, cuts to campaign spending, and an opt-in clause for trade union members.

“All three main parties,” it said “depend for their funding on a relatively small number of individuals, trade unions or other organisations. This dependency cannot be healthy for democracy”.

So, even if allegations of “dodgy donors” seem premature, if not entirely unfounded, the current “dodgy system” which even risks allowing wealthy business-people and trade unions a chance to cosy up to politicians seems untenable and serves to undermine the confidence of British voters.

While state funding might not seem like an attractive solution, it could create a more levelled playing field for political parties to operate on, eliminating the risks to democracy posed by wealthy individual donors, and thereby remedying the growing public cynicism that surrounds UK politics.

Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris

Related Itemsdavid cameroned milibandHSBC scandalparty donorstax evasion

More in Current Affairs

Women of Ireland have rolled over for long enough: The 8th and the long walk to abortion rights

Emma Kiely
Read More

Changes to expect during menopause

The editorial unit
Read More

Why Equity Linked Savings Schemes is a preferred tax saving?

The editorial unit
Read More

How the world’s top designers would rebrand political parties

The editorial unit
Read More

Royal baby furore: Proof that the British monarchy is still popular?

Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris
Read More

World Mental Health Day 2018: Raising awareness and combating stigma

The editorial unit
Read More

Seven political personalities you should know about

The editorial unit
Read More

Donald Trump: An enemy of the arts?

The editorial unit
Read More

Trump’s fortune: Where did the money come from?

The editorial unit
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap
  • Popular

  • Latest

  • TOP PICKS

  • Coldplay at Wembley Stadium: “A night that will be remembered by 80,000 people for years to come”
    Live music
  • My Old School
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Sprung
    ★★★★★
    other
  • Edinburgh Fringe 2022: Mr Moon at C Aquila
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Camden Fringe 2022: Dreamworld at Camden People’s Theatre
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Trending summer dresses everyone wants to own in a heatwave
    Fashion & Lifestyle
  • Edinburgh Fringe 2022: In PurSUEt at Underbelly, Cowgate
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Edinburgh Fringe 2022: Mr Moon at C Aquila
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Camden Fringe 2022: Keep It Down at Hope Theatre
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Camden Fringe 2022: Dreamworld at Camden People’s Theatre
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Coldplay at Wembley Stadium: “A night that will be remembered by 80,000 people for years to come”
    Live music
  • Where is Anne Frank?
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Anaïs in Love
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Sprung
    ★★★★★
    other
  • Bad Sisters
    ★★★★★
    apple
The Upcoming
Pages
  • Contact us
  • Join mailing list
  • Join us
  • Our London food map
  • Our writers
  • Support us
  • What, when, why
With the support from:
International driving license

Copyright © 2011-2020 FL Media

Minsk agreement: A teetering peace on the brink of collapse?
The power of branding and its impact on children’s health