The Upcoming
  • Cinema & Tv
    • Movie reviews
    • Film festivals
      • Berlin
      • Tribeca
      • Sundance London
      • Cannes
      • Locarno
      • Venice
      • London
      • Toronto
    • Show reviews
  • Music
    • Live music
  • Food & Drinks
    • News & Features
    • Restaurant & bar reviews
    • Interviews & Recipes
  • Theatre
  • Art
  • Travel & Lifestyle
  • Literature
  • Fashion & Beauty
    • Accessories
    • Beauty
    • News & Features
    • Shopping & Trends
    • Tips & How-tos
    • Fashion weeks
      • London Fashion Week
      • London Fashion Week Men’s
      • New York Fashion Week
      • Milan Fashion Week
      • Paris Fashion Week
      • Haute Couture
  • Join us
    • Editorial unit
    • Our writers
    • Join the team
    • Join the mailing list
    • Support us
    • Contact us
  • Competitions
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Instagram

  • YouTube

  • RSS

Current affairsNewsPolitics & Social issues

Royal baby furore: Proof that the British monarchy is still popular?

Royal baby furore: Proof that the British monarchy is still popular?
15 March 2019
Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris
Avatar
Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris
15 March 2019

The scale of the coverage for the new royal baby, Charlotte Elizabeth Diana, might be seen as evidence of the British monarchy’s sustained popularity around the world, but is this necessarily true?

A survey by Ipsos Mori in 2013 suggested that support for the monarchy is still high at 77 per cent. On the other hand, the proportion of republican sympathisers could only claim a modest backing of 17 per cent.

Furthermore, according to a YouGov survey conducted in June 2013, one month before the birth of Prince George, 82 per cent of people answered that they felt positively about the Queen and only 12 per cent of people gave a negative opinion.

Of course, questions continue to be raised about the legitimacy of the monarchy in the 21st century. There are many who regard it as a system incongruous with modern democracy; intolerable and ultimately unacceptable in times of such profound austerity and pocket-pinching for so many in the UK.

That said, evidence of interest and support for the royal family, such as the millions who reportedly celebrated the Queen’s diamond jubilee in 2012 or watched the royal wedding four years ago, is difficult to contest.

It is, however, altogether too easy to conflate the monarchy, a historic institution, with the current royal family. For people across the world, the face of Queen Elizabeth II is the defining image of the monarchy in Britain. Rarely, if ever, has she misspoken or stirred controversy, remaining ever regal and proper. This has been one of the keys to her success as a monarch and the success of her family as a global brand.

The monarchy, on the other hand, is an institution led by an unelected figure whose role, while largely ceremonial, still permits him or her to advise the prime minister on affairs of the state. General opinion would dictate that this quiet, private role is of little concern to the British public, who recognise the Queen more as an apolitical, unifying figurehead; a stalwart of British values and traditions who binds an otherwise divided country.

However, many suspect that the royal family have more say in British politics than is constitutional and who believe a fully democratic Britain is still inhibited by the monarchy.

In March this year, news broke that letters written by Prince Charles to seven governmental departments were to be made publicly available, following a long and arduous campaign by The Guardian newspaper. This is the most recent incident to call to question the political impartiality of the royal family. 

In her 2015 polemic essay Down with the Royals, Guardian journalist and outspoken republican Joan Smith highlights an incompatibility between the monarchy and a democratic state: “The whole point of hereditary monarchy is that it allows people like Prince Charles to bypass the inconvenient chores associated with democracy, such as knocking on doors and trying to persuade sceptical voters. The consequence is a system that fails every single test of diversity and equality.”

In spite of such opposition, the general reception for the royal birth has been positive. Images of William and Kate’s new daughter and messages of congratulations have come from far afield, and one could easily conclude that the world has responded warmly and in celebratory mood.

Yet, the omnipresence in the world’s press of the new princess is indicative not of the monarchy’s popularity, but of the royal family as easy news fodder. After all, William and Kate are celebrities and, as such, are bound to attract the attention of media who know that celebrity sells. Royal events are at once an opportunity for newspapers to garner sales and website hits, as well as a boon to the public profile of the royal family.

Eoin O’Sullivan-Harris

Related ItemsDuchess of CambridgePrincess Charlotte Elizabeth Dianaqueen elizabethroyal babyroyal family

More in Current Affairs

Women of Ireland have rolled over for long enough: The 8th and the long walk to abortion rights

Emma Kiely
Read More

Changes to expect during menopause

The editorial unit
Read More

Why Equity Linked Savings Schemes is a preferred tax saving?

The editorial unit
Read More

How the world’s top designers would rebrand political parties

The editorial unit
Read More

World Mental Health Day 2018: Raising awareness and combating stigma

The editorial unit
Read More

Seven political personalities you should know about

The editorial unit
Read More

Donald Trump: An enemy of the arts?

The editorial unit
Read More

Trump’s fortune: Where did the money come from?

The editorial unit
Read More

Snapchat Spectacles come to the UK

The editorial unit
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap
  • Popular

  • Latest

  • TOP PICKS

  • Ed Sheeran at Wembley Stadium
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • Eagles bring a nostalgia-laden evening to the BST Festival in Hyde Park
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • Africa Fashion at the V&A
    ★★★★★
    Art
  • “He used to spit at the audience, roll on the ground, he did, in fact, hump that plastic dog – he was the original punk rocker”: Baz Luhrman, Tom Hanks, Austin Butler, Olivia DeJonge and Alton Mason on Elvis
    Cinema & Tv
  • Tigers
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • The Terminal List
    ★★★★★
    amazon
  • Baymax!
    ★★★★★
    disney
  • Parisian bar Little Red Door to take over Adam Handling’s Eve Bar on 7 July
    Food & Drinks
  • Netflix Walking Tour
    ★★★★★
    Cinema & Tv
  • Chelsea Flower Show 2022: Greenery and wellbeing
    Fashion & Lifestyle
  • Netflix Walking Tour
    ★★★★★
    Cinema & Tv
  • Africa Fashion at the V&A
    ★★★★★
    Art
  • Minions: The Rise of Gru
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • The Rollings Stones give Glasto a run for its money at BST Festival in Hyde Park
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • “He used to spit at the audience, roll on the ground, he did, in fact, hump that plastic dog – he was the original punk rocker”: Baz Luhrman, Tom Hanks, Austin Butler, Olivia DeJonge and Alton Mason on Elvis
    Cinema & Tv
The Upcoming
Pages
  • Contact us
  • Join mailing list
  • Join us
  • Our London food map
  • Our writers
  • Support us
  • What, when, why
With the support from:
International driving license

Copyright © 2011-2020 FL Media

World Mental Health Day 2018: Raising awareness and combating stigma
How the world’s top designers would rebrand political parties