The Upcoming
  • Cinema & Tv
    • Movie reviews
    • Film festivals
      • Berlin
      • Tribeca
      • Sundance London
      • Cannes
      • Locarno
      • Venice
      • London
      • Toronto
    • Show reviews
  • Music
    • Live music
  • Food & Drinks
    • News & Features
    • Restaurant & bar reviews
    • Interviews & Recipes
  • Theatre
  • Art
  • Travel & Lifestyle
  • Literature
  • Fashion & Beauty
    • Accessories
    • Beauty
    • News & Features
    • Shopping & Trends
    • Tips & How-tos
    • Fashion weeks
      • London Fashion Week
      • London Fashion Week Men’s
      • New York Fashion Week
      • Milan Fashion Week
      • Paris Fashion Week
      • Haute Couture
  • Join us
    • Editorial unit
    • Our writers
    • Join the team
    • Join the mailing list
    • Support us
    • Contact us
  • Competitions
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Instagram

  • YouTube

  • RSS

Art

Photography: When does a picture become art?

Photography: When does a picture become art?
17 November 2017
Anna Harvey
Avatar
Anna Harvey
17 November 2017

The debate over photography being considered art is almost as old as the medium’s debut in the 19th century. It is frequently argued that a camera merely mimics what is in front of it; a photo is a simple and impersonal reproduction of an image and therefore cannot be construed as art. But is this true?

When we analyse the relationship between art and photography, it always comes down to the opposition in mediums: the dichotomy between paintbrushes and cameras. A paintbrush certainly requires a handle and dexterity that is mastered by few, whilst the camera saturates our lives and is accessible to anyone. Despite this, however, a painting – like a photograph – can be manipulated and adapted without even the work of Photoshop. Such is the case with American photographer Sally Mann, whose controversial series Family Pictures depicts photos of her children not only semi-nude but also corpse-like.

Family Pictures, Sally Mann, 1984-91

Her daughter’s body lies limp on what appears to be a man’s lap, her eyes are closed and her face is vacant. The unidentified figure holds his finger to her neck as though he’s reading her pulse. The way the light falls on the child’s face is almost phantasmal, and the black-and-white filter is emblematic of the Victorian practice of photographing dead children. However, this is completely staged. Mann has manipulated the lighting and the angle to make her daughter appear deceased – which still shocks many and fascinates others. Although contentious, it is exactly this blurring of truth and fiction in the photograph that transfixes us and renders the picture “art” in more traditional terms: it is unpredictable and has taken great artistry to achieve such an impressionable result.

However, defining what “art” is presents an even older and knottier debate, yet most have agreed that art is subjective and dependent on interpretation; so, usually, if a picture generates meaning it can be considered art. Just how subjective this is can be seen in many of the most famous artworks that adorn the walls of galleries. There exist two types of people in the art world: those who snort in disbelief at the success of Piet Mondrian’s Composition series, and those who argue that such a minimalistic image is ridden with layers of meaning. So if it is truly down to interpretation could every photographic image be a work of art if we regard it as such?

Composition with Yellow, Blue and Red, Piet Mondrain, 1937-42

With the rise of social media and the ability to photograph anything at any time, can we honestly say a selfie is a work of art? Such photos, to many, are not interchangeable with the self-portrait, because the self-portrait in photography intends to document a shrouded side to the artist’s personality, whereas a selfie is considered purely self-indulgent. For many, the self-portrait, unlike the selfie, reveals something to the viewer, it is not purely cosmetic but instead expressive.

Untitled A, Cindy Sherman, 1975

Cindy Sherman is a hugely respected photographer of the 20th century and used the self-portrait to depict various sides of her personality. By dressing herself up in various guises she managed to overturn gender roles and deconstruct the self, inspiring viewers, women and artists in the process. The difference between Cindy Sherman’s artistic self-portraits and the abundance of selfies we see on Instagram is therefore in the intent behind the photograph. Yet can selfies ever be intended to deconstruct the self? Or be used as a means of self-expression? The majority of selfies are, of course, taken as a means of instant gratification, a means to capture a moment when we feel particularly good about ourselves, but this moment is nonetheless expressive. It is still a means to probe and share a depiction of ourselves in a world awash with images. It is, after all, a carefully articulated and posed version of ourselves that we choose to exhibit in the very public world of social media. Although there will probably always be a distinction between the selfie and the self-portrait, the selfie is a prevalent form of self-expression, and a picture that produces a visceral exchange with the viewer and intends to define or express something can certainly be considered art.

Anna Harvey

For further information about Sally Mann visit the artist’s website here.

Related Items

More in Art

Africa Fashion at the V&A

★★★★★
Jessica Wall
Read More

Edvard Munch: Masterpieces from Bergen

★★★★★
James White
Read More

Summer Exhibition 2022 at the Royal Academy of Arts

★★★★★
Mersa Auda
Read More

Penny Goring: Penny World at ICA

★★★★★
Mersa Auda
Read More

Metamorphosis and flow: Orlanda Broom debuts powerful abstract show Shapeshifters at Grove Square Galleries

The editorial unit
Read More

Feminine Power: The Divine to the Demonic at the British Museum

★★★★★
Jessica Wall
Read More

Cornelia Parker at Tate Britain

★★★★★
James White
Read More

Our Time on Earth at the Barbican

★★★★★
Jessica Wall
Read More

Yayoi Kusama: Infinity Mirror Rooms at Tate Modern

★★★★★
Cristiana Ferrauti
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap
  • Popular

  • Latest

  • TOP PICKS

  • Africa Fashion at the V&A
    ★★★★★
    Art
  • Beauty and the Beast: The Musical at London Palladium
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • Netflix Walking Tour: From Bridgerton to The Crown, a free walking tour through the filming locations
    Cinema & Tv
  • St Vincent at the Hammersmith Apollo
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • Minions: The Rise of Gru
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • The Railway Children Return
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Eric Ravilious: Drawn to War
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Beauty and the Beast: The Musical at London Palladium
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • The Terminal List
    ★★★★★
    amazon
  • Baymax!
    ★★★★★
    disney
  • The Railway Children Return
    ★★★★★
    Movie review
  • Beauty and the Beast: The Musical at London Palladium
    ★★★★★
    Theatre
  • St Vincent at the Hammersmith Apollo
    ★★★★★
    Live music
  • Netflix Walking Tour: From Bridgerton to The Crown, a free walking tour through the filming locations
    Cinema & Tv
  • Africa Fashion at the V&A
    ★★★★★
    Art
The Upcoming
Pages
  • Contact us
  • Join mailing list
  • Join us
  • Our London food map
  • Our writers
  • Support us
  • What, when, why
With the support from:
International driving license

Copyright © 2011-2020 FL Media

Red Star over Russia: A Revolution in Visual Culture 1905-55 at Tate Modern | Exhibition review
Modigliani at Tate Modern | Exhibition review